NVIDIA xStock

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The claimed privacy notice does not answer the slot question because “privacy notice” is not one of the requested document types (prospectus, terms, attestation, audit, or fact-sheet). Moreo | anthropic: confirmed — The archived xStocks Terms of Service verbatim references the Privacy Notice at the exact claimed URL (https://xstocks.com/documents/xstocks-privacy-policy.pdf) and names it the 'Privacy Notice,' conf

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=2) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The sources confirm that the linked repository contains the Base Prospectus, related Final Terms, and country-restriction information, but the claim describes the repository as a whole. It d | anthropic: confirmed — Both cited sources are present in the archive and support the claim exactly. xStocks.fi states 'the Base Prospectus and related Final Terms for xStocks at https://assets.backed.fi/legal-documentation'

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The RWA.xyz asset page labels the terms as “Backed Assets Final Terms Nr 19 (NVDAx),” but it is an aggregator page, not the original legal-terms document. The fetched content provides neithe | anthropic: confirmed — The archived RWA.xyz NVDAx page lists under the 'Legal & Regulatory' > 'Terms' field exactly 'Backed Assets Final Terms Nr 19 (NVDAx)', matching both claimed quotes verbatim. The claim characterizes t

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=2) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The sources support that primary-market issuance and redemption can align xStocks with underlying assets, but they do not identify crypto-market volatility as a cause of NVDAx price divergen | anthropic: unsupported — The two quotes are both accurately reproduced in the archived sources (Kraken's 'Kryptomarkkinoiden arvaamaton luonne voi johtaa varojen menetykseen.' and the xStocks issuance/redemption passage), so

Verifier note: panel 0/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=3) | gpt: contradicted — The KYC and $5,000 direct-redemption threshold and the 0.50% fee with a $100 minimum are supported. However, the assertion that the disclosed evidence provides no timing is contradicted: issuer docume | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The SLOT QUESTION asks what happens when everyone redeems at once — caps, redemption windows, notice periods, gating. The claim's material facts are all individually well-supported by the un | kimi: contradicted — KYC and the $5,000 direct-redemption minimum are supported by the xStocks FAQ, and the $100 minimum redemption fee is supported by rwa.xyz. However, the claim that 'disclosed evidence provides no caps

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 5d6612ac-f08e-4cc8-8332-cf5ded0f456c: The incumbent directly links NVDAx’s tracked value to a specific deterioration risk in NVIDIA’s underlying business: additional export controls affecting named H20 products during Fiscal 2026. NVIDIA’s own SEC filing supports that concrete risk. The new claim establishes only generic price exposure and possible total loss, without identifying any business or yield-source deterioration that would cause the loss.

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The source confirms that holders may sell NVDAx on Kraken for U.S. dollars, cryptocurrencies, or stablecoins, and separately states 24/5 trading availability. However, the required exit-path | anthropic: confirmed — goal-fit: the claim describes the Kraken-sale exit path (method: sell NVDAx for USD, crypto, or stablecoins directly on Kraken) plus its trading availability, which answers the method portion of the r

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The aggregator states “Performance Fees 0%,” but the slot requires both the rate and who charges it in the value text. The claim attributes the report to “the issuer,” while the cited page i | anthropic: confirmed — The archived RWA.xyz page for NVDAx explicitly lists 'Performance Fees 0 %' in both the Key Facts section and the Fees section, directly supporting the claimed 0% performance fee rate. The value addre

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The aggregator states “Management Fees 0%,” but the required value must also identify who charges the fee. It does not establish that the issuer charges or reports this fee, and no qualifyin | anthropic: confirmed — The archived RWA.xyz page for NVDAx explicitly lists 'Management Fees 0 %' in both the Key Facts section and the Fees section, directly supporting the claimed 0% management fee rate. This answers the

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The aggregator states a 0.50% redemption fee based on market price, subject to a USD 100 minimum, but it does not state that the issuer charges this fee. The required evidence classes are le | anthropic: confirmed — The archived RWA.xyz page for NVDAx states verbatim under Redemption Description: "Redemption fee is 0.50% of market price with a minimum of USD 100," and lists Redemption Fees as 0.50%. This matches

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The aggregator states a 0.50% subscription fee with a USD 100 minimum, but it does not state that the issuer charges the fee. The required value must identify who charges it, and no qualifyi | anthropic: confirmed — The source verbatim states under Primary Market: 'Subscription fee is 0.50% of market price with a minimum of USD 100.' and lists Subscription Fees 0.50%. The rate and USD 100 minimum match exactly. T

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The source confirms that the mint has permanent-delegate, default-account-state, pausable-config, and transfer-hook extensions with the stated capabilities. However, the claim does not ident | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The four enumerated capabilities (permanent-delegate transfers/burns, default-frozen accounts, global pausing, custom transfer-hook logic) are each fully and accurately supported by the Sola

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The issuer documentation explicitly supports native issuance on TON and other EVM-compatible networks, but the claim does not list every documented chain as required. The FAQ identifies Ethe | anthropic: confirmed — The issuer FAQ (docs.xstocks.fi/docs/frequently-asked-questions) states verbatim: 'xStocks are issued natively on Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, Mantle, TON, Ink, and other EVM-compatible networks.' This

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The source identifies Grant Thornton (Cayman) as NVDAx's auditor, but it provides neither the audit scope nor an audit date. Therefore, it does not answer the slot question requiring one aud | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The source confirms the auditor identity ('Auditor: Grant Thornton (Cayman)'), so the bare fact is evidence-supported. But the SLOT QUESTION requires audits_<firm> = scope + date (fund audit

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 62e03dac-2d9e-49c6-a28c-668152f47353: The incumbent directly addresses all three aspects: purchase restrictions by client type and supported country, a named on-chain freeze authority with default-frozen account capability, and transfer-hook logic on every transfer. Its evidence is more specific and comprehensive than the new claim, which addresses transfer permissionlessness and issuance/redemption whitelisting but provides no freeze or jurisdiction details.

Verifier note: WARNING: evidence class mismatch; trusted tier 1 evidence requires substance and goal-fit review | panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The Kraken page supports the narrow proposition that NVDAx holders do not own the underlying NVIDIA shares and lack the shares’ voting, information, and other shareholder rights. However, th | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The SLOT QUESTION asks for the mechanics of an issuer failure — who controls the assets in insolvency, what claim NVDAx holders would have, and who ranks ahead of them in the waterfall. The

Verifier note: WARNING: evidence class mismatch; trusted tier 1 evidence requires substance and goal-fit review | panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=2) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The sources state that Backed Assets (JE) Limited is a Jersey private limited company and issues xStocks, but they do not establish that this company is the legal wrapper protecting holders | anthropic: confirmed — The xstocks.fi footer states verbatim: 'xStocks are issued by Backed Assets (JE) Limited (a Jersey private limited company)', directly supporting the issuing legal vehicle and its Jersey private limit

Verifier note: panel 1/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — The xStocks website states that xStocks are offered to eligible Kraken customers via PDSL and that PDSL is licensed by the Bermuda Monetary Authority to conduct digital-asset business. However, the sl | anthropic: confirmed — The archived xstocks.fi disclaimer states verbatim that xStocks are 'offered to eligible Kraken customers via Payward Digital Solutions Ltd. (“PDSL”), a company licensed to conduct digital asset busin | gpt: unsupported — The source states that PDSL offers xStocks to eligible Kraken customers, while EU/EEA customers are served through PEDLS-CY. The unqualified claim that PDSL offers xStocks to “eligible customers” omit

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=2) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The sources support NVIDIA common stock as the sole stated backing, 1:1 token-to-share backing, and custody by a regulated external custodian. The narrative also appropriately identifies the | anthropic: confirmed — The claim answers the SLOT QUESTION: it names the reserve asset class (100% NVIDIA Corporation Common Stock), its share (1:1 / full backing), and flags valuation basis and dated attestation as undiscl

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=2) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The RWA.xyz content directly identifies Alpaca Securities LLC as custodian, Grant Thornton (Cayman) as auditor, and Maerki Baumann & Co. AG as paying agent. The Kraken sources identify Paywa | anthropic: confirmed — Each named service provider appears verbatim in the cited sources. The rwa.xyz NVDAx page lists 'Custodian ... Alpaca Securities LLC 0001702580', 'Auditor Grant Thornton (Cayman)', and 'Paying Agent M

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited aggregator states an “Inception Date” of 06/20/2025, but it does not state that the token/product launched on that date. No qualifying blog announcement or issuer documentation est | anthropic: confirmed — The archived RWA.xyz page for NVIDIA xStock (NVDAx) lists 'Inception Date 06/20/2025' under Key Facts, which directly corresponds to the claimed launch_date of 2025-06-20. Inception date for a tokeniz

Verifier note: registry: superseded

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited aggregator labels the issuer as “Backed Assets,” but it does not provide the issuer’s full legal entity name required by this slot, such as “Backed Assets (JE) Ltd.” No qualifying | anthropic: confirmed — The archived RWA.xyz asset page for NVDAx contains a 'Legal & Regulatory' section with the field 'Issuer' whose value is stated verbatim as 'Backed Assets', matching the claimed issuer_entity exactly,

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The source states that each NVDAx token is linked 1:1 to real NVIDIA common shares and that xStocks are fully collateralized by custodied traditional shares. However, it provides no dated ho | anthropic: unsupported — The two claimed quotes appear verbatim in the archived Kraken FAQ, and they do support the descriptive backing: each NVDAx token is pegged 1:1 to real NVIDIA Corporation Common Stock held by a regulat

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The archived page explicitly states 1:1 backing and full collateralization by underlying shares held by a regulated third-party custodian, supporting a disclosed 100% backing ratio. However, | anthropic: confirmed — The source states each NVDAx token is pegged 1:1 to real NVIDIA shares held by a third-party custodian ('sidottu suhteessa 1:1 oikeisiin NVIDIA Corporation Common Stock -osakkeisiin') and that all xSt

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The sources support that NVDAx tracks NVIDIA share-price changes and that Kraken separately pays weekly Opt-In Rewards. However, they do not identify the rewards’ economic funding source or | anthropic: confirmed — The slot concerns where NVDAx yield economically originates and who captures spread. The narrative answers this directly and honestly. Material claim 1 — NVDAx economics primarily reflect NVIDIA share

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 4cb29b25-b096-4bc9-a811-9404af9ade57: The incumbent directly addresses the full slot by identifying complete concentration in NVIDIA Corporation Common Stock and explicitly covering the absence of disclosed duration, maturity, and credit rating. Its own evidence supports the 1:1 single-name equity backing. The new claim addresses concentration only and is therefore less complete.

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The source supports a 1:1 link to NVIDIA common shares and states that xStocks are fully collateralized by traditional shares held by a regulated external custodian. However, it provides nei | anthropic: confirmed — Every material claim is supported by the Kraken NVDAx page. The source states each NVDAx token is pegged 1:1 to real NVIDIA Corporation Common Stock ('sidottu suhteessa 1:1 oikeisiin NVIDIA Corporatio

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 20d99bbd-99a2-4cbf-930b-dc84c43b2a33: Both claims directly provide the identical legal entity name, NVIDIA Corporation, and each has SEC evidence supporting it. Because claim quality is tied, the incumbent wins under the stated tie-break rule.

Verifier note: WARNING: evidence class mismatch; trusted tier 1 evidence requires substance and goal-fit review | panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited Kraken page supports that NVDAx holders do not own the underlying NVIDIA shares and lack shareholder, voting, and information rights. However, it does not establish the affirmative | anthropic: confirmed — The slot asks what the holder legally owns; the claim asserts the token conveys no ownership or shareholder rights in the underlying NVIDIA shares. The archived Kraken NVDAx page supports this verbati

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 865bc0f1-a45a-4ce2-a357-03b2c23c50bf: Both claims directly classify NVDAx as tokenized equity, but the incumbent's own evidence is more specific: it identifies NVIDIA Corporation Common Stock, states a 1:1 backing ratio, and specifies that the underlying shares are held by a third-party custodian. With equal classification and stronger supporting detail, the incumbent wins.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 926f5146-b25b-4b5d-af78-f079397c08fe: The incumbent directly addresses the token, holder rights, and backing, while adding the specifically supported redemption right through Backed and regulated third-party custody. Its cited evidence supports each material statement, making it more specific than the new claim’s general description of indirect economic exposure.

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The Kraken product page states that fees are charged as described in each xStock's base prospectus, but it does not identify a specific prospectus, provide its date, or give an original-sour | anthropic: confirmed — The archived Kraken NVDAx page contains the claimed quote verbatim in the redemption FAQ: "kaikista xStockeihin tehtävistä sijoituksista peritään maksu kunkin xStockin perusesitteessä esitetyllä taval

Verifier note: panel 1/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — evidence class mismatch | anthropic: confirmed — The archived app.rwa.xyz/assets/NVDAx page explicitly lists under the 'Terms' field: 'Backed Assets Final Terms Nr 19 (NVDAx)', directly matching the claimed quote and confirming this is the governing | gpt: unsupported — evidence class mismatch

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited Kraken page supports that the xStocks Opt-In Rewards announcement is dated April 2, 2026, and contains the quoted 1:1-backing statement. However, a product announcement is not one | anthropic: confirmed — The archived page at the cited URL displays the byline date "April 2, 2026" for the article titled "Introducing xStocks Opt-In Rewards," confirming Kraken published this announcement on that date. Bot

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited legal terms explicitly state that tokenized equities are not offered by Backed Finance or its affiliates directly to the public, but the claim does not answer the slot question, wh | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The quote is verbatim-accurate — Section 7.1 of the terms states "Tokenized equities are NOT offered by us or by any affiliated entity of ours directly to the public" — so the claim is factu

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited Backed article confirms that a legal-documentation library exists and directs readers there for legal documents and prohibited/restricted-country lists, but it does not identify on | anthropic: confirmed — The archived press release contains the exact claimed quote verbatim: "For a full list of prohibited and restricted countries and review of legal documentation, please visit, https://www.assets.backed

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 130c7c88-84bf-496b-bc1e-8ff18545fb41: The incumbent directly addresses registration status and regulatory approval, naming HSBC, SEC and state securities commissions, Rule 433, Registration No. 333-277211, and June 18, 2026, with precise SEC-filed evidence. The new claim addresses geographic restrictions and absent protections but is comparatively vague about jurisdictions, restricted investors, specific regulatory actions, and holder impact.

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: contradicted — The wallet-withdrawal method is supported: Kraken states that NVDAx can be withdrawn to any compatible blockchain wallet. However, the same NVDAx page expressly discloses a separate path to redeem xSt | anthropic: confirmed — The claim asserts (1) Kraken holders can withdraw NVDAx to compatible blockchain wallets, and (2) that this withdrawal is not disclosed as direct share redemption. Both cited quotes are verbatim-accur

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 83e91502-7ffb-43b7-8781-c73d5076604d: The incumbent directly answers every part of the slot: Solana is the canonical chain, it gives the exact mint, and it explicitly classifies the instance as a native Token-2022 issue rather than bridged. Its own evidence supports the native designation, mint address, token standard, and NVIDIA xStock identity. The new claim gives the mint and Token-2022 issuance but does not itself clearly state the canonical-chain or native-versus-bridged conclusion.

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The source names Grant Thornton (Cayman) as auditor, but it provides neither the audit scope nor an audit date. Therefore, it does not answer the slot question requiring scope + date for eac | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The slot question requires one fact per audit giving scope + date (fund audits AND smart-contract audits). The archived source confirms only 'Auditor: Grant Thornton (Cayman)' — the firm nam

Verifier note: panel 0/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=3) | gpt: contradicted — The sources support the evolution of bTokens into xStocks with the same underlying exposure, NVDAx’s June 20, 2025 inception date, and weekly opt-in rewards. However, the claim that the corpus provide | anthropic: contradicted — The bTokens-to-xStocks evolution and same underlying exposure are supported by the Backed article ('xStocks are the next evolution of bTokens — same underlying exposure...'), and NVDAx's 06/20/2025 in | kimi: contradicted — Two of three sub-claims hold: the backed.fi page contains 'xStocks are the next evolution of bTokens — same underlying exposure' (in the archived page content) and rwa.xyz lists NVDAx Inception Date 0

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent a27ea24f-02e0-4dca-8d1a-d9b7c9ee5dfa: The new claim directly lists three named security-relevant Token-2022 extensions and their observed configuration, while the incumbent only gives a vague count. Both cite equally weak evidence with no quote, so the new claim is more specific.

Verifier note: sibling-consistency: superseded by STRCx evidence

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The Kraken announcement supports that Mark Greenberg is Kraken’s Global Head of Consumer and publicly ties him to xStocks Opt-In Rewards, which answers the slot question. However, it does no | anthropic(sub:gpt): unsupported — goal-fit: The Kraken announcement supports that Mark Greenberg is Kraken’s Global Head of Consumer and publicly ties him to xStocks Opt-In Rewards, which answers the key-people slot. It does not estab [duplicate actual family allowed by substitution]

Verifier note: panel 0/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited Solana Explorer page supports that the address is a Token-2022 mint, but the claim does not provide the key document’s required type (prospectus/terms/attestation/audit/fact-sheet) | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The slot question asks for a key document classified as one of {prospectus/terms/attestation/audit/fact-sheet} with a date and original-source URL. While the archived Solana Explorer page do | kimi: unsupported — goal-fit: the slot requires key documents of type prospectus/terms/attestation/audit/fact-sheet with a date and source URL. The claimed 'document' is a Solana Explorer on-chain Token-2022 mint record,

Verifier note: panel 0/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The explorer confirms that the mint uses an updatable UI-display multiplier, but it does not answer what the issuer may change without holder consent under its legal terms. The cited materia | anthropic: unsupported — evidence class mismatch | kimi: unsupported — evidence class mismatch

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: “$1,000 per Note” states the principal amount or denomination of each Note, not a minimum initial subscription or purchase requirement. | anthropic: unsupported — evidence class mismatch

Verifier note: re-adjudicated 2026-08-05T23:44:56.198Z from rejected status | panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=2) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The sources describe NVDAx as tracking NVIDIA stock and CMC AI says it is backed 1:1 by NVIDIA shares, but neither provides a dated holding disclosure establishing NVIDIA common stock as the | anthropic: confirmed — Both cited sources support that NVDAx's underlying reference is NVIDIA Corporation stock. RWA.xyz states 'Tokenized version of NVIDIA Corporation.' and CoinMarketCap states NVDAX 'tracks the price of

Verifier note: re-adjudicated 2026-08-05T23:41:17.063Z from rejected status | panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=2) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The sources describe NVDAX as tracking NVIDIA stock and being backed 1:1 by NVIDIA shares, but the claimed holding fact provides neither a portfolio weight nor an as-of date, both required b | anthropic: unsupported — The bare description 'Tokenized version of NVIDIA Corporation' is confirmed by RWA.xyz, but the specific claim value hinges on two things the fetched sources do not solidly support. (1) 'NVIDIA Corpor