NVIDIA xStock

Verifier note: re-adjudicated 2026-08-05T23:36:35.151Z from rejected status | panel 0/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=2, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited sources support daily subscriptions and possible geographic restrictions, but those facts do not answer the slot question about redemption caps, gating mechanisms, redemption windo | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: Both quotes are individually accurate — the RWA.xyz page does show "Subscription Time / Daily" (and "Redemption Time / Daily"), and the Kraken page footer does contain "Maantieteellisiä rajo | kimi: unsupported — goal-fit: the claim is factually true but does not answer the slot question, which asks about redemption gates — caps, windows, notice periods, and what happens under mass exit. RWA.xyz supports 'Subs

Verifier note: panel 1/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — evidence class mismatch | anthropic: confirmed — The archived content from the cited source (https://app.rwa.xyz/assets/NVDAx) contains, under the 'Terms' heading in the Legal & Regulatory section, the exact string 'Backed Assets Final Terms Nr 19 ( | gpt: unsupported — evidence class mismatch

Unsupported by provided evidence; the capability claims collapse if the extensions list is not evidenced.

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The source confirms that the mint has enabled freeze/default-frozen, permanent-delegate, pausable, transfer-hook, and scaled-UI extensions, and it identifies mint and freeze-authority addres | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: Every capability listed in the claim is directly and accurately supported by the fetched Solana Explorer page. The five quotes match verbatim: scaledUiAmountConfig ('Allows the token program

Drop the missing id and add the segregation detail the slot mandates, or note segregation as undisclosed.

Verifier note: re-adjudicated 2026-08-05T23:48:11.481Z from rejected status | panel 1/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=3, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The sources support Alpaca Securities LLC as custodian, describe the third-party custodian generically as regulated, mention BitGo only in a caution-labeled CMC AI example, and state that Kr | anthropic: confirmed — The claim is a custody-attribution list, and every item is supported by the union of the fetched sources — it directly answers the SLOT QUESTION (who holds the underlying, their regulated status, and | kimi: unsupported — Alpaca Securities is well supported (RWA.xyz names 'Alpaca Securities LLC' as Custodian; CMC also names it), and Kraken's own page confirms Kraken is not a party to the custody agreement. BitGo, howev

Remove Alpaca; the only named service/distribution entity in the corpus is Payward Europe Digital Solutions (CY) Ltd.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 179e9f92-04a4-4fb9-8047-4e5bcf2bebb1: Both claims directly identify Alpaca Securities LLC as custodian and cite identical evidence supporting legal identifier 0001702580. The new claim adds 'of underlying shares,' which its evidence does not expressly support. With evidence quality otherwise tied, the incumbent wins.

Consolidate into one resolution.

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The sources support that NVDAx tracks the underlying NVIDIA share value, is 1:1 backed, and can provide applicable dividends; they also support a separate opt-in program paying up to 1% week | anthropic: confirmed — goal-fit: the claim directly answers the slot question about the economic source of holder returns — it states the primary return is NVIDIA share-price movement plus applicable dividends, and specific

Resolve — either state the qualified backing with its lack of dated attestation, or mark unknown, not both.

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The source supports NVIDIA Corporation Common Stock as the disclosed backing and a 1:1 share-per-token basis, with no other reserve category stated. However, neither the claim nor the cited | anthropic: confirmed — The claim answers the SLOT QUESTION on reserve composition: asset class = NVIDIA Corporation Common Stock, disclosed share = 100%, valuation basis = one share per token (1:1), residual = none disclose

Drop the phantom citation.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 20d99bbd-99a2-4cbf-930b-dc84c43b2a33: Both claims directly provide the identical legal entity name, NVIDIA Corporation, and each is supported by its own Kraken and SEC evidence. Because specificity and evidentiary quality are tied, the incumbent wins.

Recite b4ecdd00 only, or add a real id.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 865bc0f1-a45a-4ce2-a357-03b2c23c50bf: Both claims identically classify the underlying asset as tokenized-equity and cite identical evidence naming NVIDIA Corporation Common Stock and 1:1 backing by custodied shares. Quality is tied, so the incumbent wins.

Misreading/overscope. Evidence 4eb9fc8e is specifically about the 'Opt-In Rewards' product availability ('Not available in the US and other geographic restrictions apply'), not xStocks transfer or holding restrictions generally. Generalizing a rewards-availability note into a blanket 'xStocks exclude United States users' transfer restriction overstates what the single cited item supports.

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited disclaimer confirms that the xStocks Opt-In Rewards product is unavailable in the US and subject to other geographic restrictions, but it does not establish transfer restrictions f | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The quote 'Not available in the US and other geographic restrictions apply.' is verbatim-accurate in the source, but its subject is the Opt-In Rewards program (offered via Payward Digital So

Omission. The slot explicitly asks for 'licenses held', but the synthesis ignores available licensing evidence: Payward entities regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland (d4f29fca, be22ea22, 61b05368, c3f55d18) and Payward Services Limited authorised as an FCA Electronic Money Institution FRN 1010381 (1b9d447a). At minimum the distributor regulatory status should be noted.

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — evidence class mismatch | anthropic: confirmed — Both claimed quotes appear verbatim in the archived source content. The Kraken blog post explicitly states: "Neither this product nor xStocks are or will be registered with any other local securities

Omits the legal wrapper: ev 6e15ea26 characterizes the token as a 'tracker certificate' issued by Backed Finance. 'Indirect economic exposure' captures the economics but not what the holder legally owns (a certificate / issuer claim). Slot asks specifically what the holder legally owns.

Verifier note: WARNING: evidence class mismatch; trusted tier 1 evidence requires substance and goal-fit review | panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The Kraken page supports indirect price exposure and the absence of ownership, voting, information, and other shareholder rights in the underlying shares. However, it does not answer what th | anthropic: confirmed — The archived Kraken NVDAx page directly supports every element of the holder_claim. It states investment enables indirect exposure without ownership of the underlying share ('Kaupankäynti näillä tuott

Remove unless onboarding evidence is supplied.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent f8459483-e1f3-4aeb-809d-79df70c31e4f: Both claims directly address KYC/KYB steps and cite identical evidence, but the new claim adds 'jurisdictional' eligibility, which its evidence does not explicitly support. The incumbent more precisely matches its cited evidence; ties also favor the incumbent.

Remove unless the cited eligibility materials are supplied.

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The source supports only Kraken secondary-purchase eligibility: retail clients in certain permitted countries must complete account verification. It does not identify investor classes, accre | anthropic(sub:gpt): unsupported — goal-fit: The source describes eligibility to buy NVDAx through Kraken—retail clients in certain countries who complete account verification—but does not establish investor classes, KYC tiers, or excl [duplicate actual family allowed by substitution]

Do not use this evidence alone as a depeg-risk candidate.

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited issuer page explicitly supports that xStock fees can make NVDAx redemption value lower than the potential return from holding NVIDIA shares directly. However, this concerns redempt | anthropic(sub:gpt): unsupported — goal-fit: The cited Kraken issuer page explicitly supports that xStock fees can make NVDAx’s value at redemption lower than the potential return from directly owning NVIDIA shares. However, this conce [duplicate actual family allowed by substitution]

Remove unless token-control evidence is supplied and identify the actual authority rather than attributing powers generically to Solana.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent d1707b6b-18dc-45a2-9588-f2893c8ba9ad: The incumbent directly addresses Solana's on-chain attack surface and is broader and better supported by its own evidence: it identifies mint and freeze authorities and documents pause, permanent-delegate, and transfer-hook capabilities. The new claim is narrower, and its frozen-by-default evidence does not by itself establish a general authority to freeze existing holder accounts.

Remove unless custody and failure-impact evidence is supplied.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 59672b84-8dc1-44ac-9980-a5843fee064d: The incumbent directly answers the failure-risk slot by stating that failure of the named custodian, Alpaca Securities, could impair the NVIDIA shares backing NVDAx. Its evidence identifies Alpaca Securities LLC and legal identifier 0001702580 as custodian and confirms that third-party custodians safeguard the underlying shares under an agreement excluding Kraken. The new claim describes the custody arrangement but does not state the consequence of provider failure.

Do not infer total-loss exposure from the supplied evidence.

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The issuer confirms that NVDAx value tracks the underlying NVIDIA shares and that investors can lose their entire investment. However, it does not say that a decline in NVIDIA shares—without | anthropic(sub:gpt): unsupported — goal-fit: Kraken supports that NVDAx gains or loses value relative to NVIDIA shares and that an investor can lose the entire amount invested. However, the claim does not identify deterioration in NVID [duplicate actual family allowed by substitution]

Remove unless evidence establishes both the sale mechanism and its treatment as an exit path under this slot.

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The source expressly supports the stated Kraken sale method and settlement assets, but the value does not fully answer the required exit-path slot: it omits settlement timing, minimum, caps/ | anthropic(sub:gpt): unsupported — goal-fit: The source explicitly supports the method: holders may sell xStocks directly on Kraken for U.S. dollars, cryptocurrency, or stablecoins. However, the value does not answer the required exit- [duplicate actual family allowed by substitution]

Remove unless the cited evidence is supplied and directly supports the full path, including method, settlement timing, minimum, caps or gates, and fee.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 8eb417b3-99ad-47e8-8546-4ecb0854264a: The claims are substantively equivalent and cite identical evidence. Both identify Backed, the 0.50% redemption fee, and the USD 100 minimum fee, while neither covers settlement timing or caps/gates. Because quality is tied, the incumbent wins.

Separate announced product scope and planned distribution/integration from established business operations.

Verifier note: registry: superseded

Most of the acquisition and redemption lifecycle is unsupported by the supplied evidence.

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The sources support eligibility, purchases with USD/crypto/stablecoins, value exposure to NVIDIA share-price movements, Kraken sales, compatible-wallet withdrawals, and fee-bearing Backed re | anthropic(sub:gpt): confirmed — The sources support each lifecycle element: geographically eligible, verified Kraken retail clients can acquire NVDAx using U.S. dollars, cryptocurrency, or stablecoins; NVDAx provides indirect exposu [duplicate actual family allowed by substitution]

Unsupported and overlaps risk_custodian; not a genuine credit disclosure.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent df757102-e0cc-4da5-a45b-3c05d74c541b: The new claim directly identifies HSBC USA Inc. as the counterparty whose failure threatens all payments and precisely characterizes holders' exposure as senior unsecured issuer credit risk. Its cited SEC evidence expressly supports the payment obligation, unsecured status, and absence of FDIC insurance or bank guarantees. The incumbent identifies Alpaca Securities LLC as custodian but does not establish from its evidence the legal nature or consequences of Alpaca's failure for holders.

Unverifiable.

Verifier note: panel 1/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — evidence class mismatch | anthropic: confirmed — The fetched rwa.xyz page for NVDAx contains, under the 'Legal & Regulatory' > 'Terms' field, the exact string 'Backed Assets Final Terms Nr 19 (NVDAx)', matching the claimed quote verbatim. This estab | kimi: unsupported — goal-fit: the slot requires one fact per key document giving type, date, and the URL at the original source; the claim itself concedes date undisclosed and original-source URL unavailable, so it does

Internal inconsistency across slots.

Verifier note: panel 1/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — evidence class mismatch | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The archived content is genuinely this Kraken NVDAx page and all three quoted passages appear verbatim in it, so the quotes themselves are supported. However, the SLOT QUESTION requires each | kimi: confirmed — The archived snapshot is exactly the Kraken NVDAx product page at the claimed URL (kraken.com/mx/xstocks/nvdax), containing product description, FAQ, and risk disclosures — consistent with the claimed

Wrong slot and unsupported; issuer-failure/what-survives is unanswered.

Verifier note: panel 0/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited Kraken page supports that NVDAx provides indirect NVIDIA exposure without ownership, voting, information, or other underlying-shareholder rights. However, this describes the ordina | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The SLOT QUESTION asks what holders lose and what survives if the issuer itself fails, is fraudulent, or walks away (counterparty/insolvency risk). The claim instead describes the nature of | kimi: unsupported — evidence class mismatch. The claim's substance (indirect exposure; no ownership, voting, information, or other shareholder rights) is accurately reflected on the Kraken NVDAx product page, but that pa

Overreach; evidence shows secondary trading occurred, not a redemption mechanism.

Verifier note: panel 0/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited transaction-history snippets show successful Raydium and Jupiter-labeled instructions involving the token, but they do not establish that token holders can exit, identify the swaps | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The slot demands, per disclosed exit path, method + settlement timing + minimum + caps/gates + fee. The claim only asserts that holders can swap on Raydium/Jupiter 'subject to available mark | kimi: unsupported — The archived explorer history shows one successful "Raydium Clmm: Swap V2" and one "Jupiter: Route" transaction touching the token's address, which establishes that the token appears in Raydium/Jupite

These two facts are the only NVDA-linked evidence present, and they belong to the HSBC USA Autocallable Notes.

Verifier note: panel 1/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — The SEC filing establishes that the described HSBC notes have a single Reference Asset—NVIDIA Corporation common stock—and that the stock trades under NVDA. However, it never identifies or discusses “ | anthropic: confirmed — The SEC free writing prospectus (regulator-class, an assigned required evidence class) directly states the Reference Asset is 'The common stock of NVIDIA Corporation (Ticker: NVDA) (the "Company").' a | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The SEC-filed prospectus supports that NVIDIA Corporation common stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under “NVDA,” but this identification fact does not address concentration in

The corpus contains no redemption-fee data for any NVDAx/Backed product; this candidate must be dropped.

Verifier note: panel 0/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — evidence class mismatch | anthropic: unsupported — evidence class mismatch | gpt: unsupported — evidence class mismatch